Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Peterson v. Dekmar et al
as 1:2018cv04072
Defendant:
Erik Vaughn, Brady Pike, William L. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Joe W. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Dekmar et al
as 3:2018cv00105
Defendant:
Erik Vaughn, Brady Pike, William L. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Joe W. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edge et al v. Pike Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv04016
Defendant:
Pike Corporation, Pike Enterprises, LLC and Pike Electric, LLC
Plaintiff:
Christopher Edge and Valerie Edge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PIKE v. Probation Officers of State of Georgia
as 4:2017cv00210
Petitioner:
BENJAMIN A PIKE
Respondent:
PROBATION OFFICERS OF STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Motes v. State of Missouri et al
as 2:2017cv00181
Plaintiff:
Grady Lee Motes
Defendant:
State of Missouri, County of Pike and County of Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PNC Bank, National Association et al v. Kentucky Pain Group, PSC et al
as 2:2016mc00006
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank, National Association and PNC Equipment Finance, LLC
Defendant:
Kentucky Pain Group, PSC, Kentucky Pain Physicians, PC, Physician Services, P.S.C. and others
Collins et al v. Kingsbury et al
as 3:2015cv00192
Plaintiff:
Ira Collins and Robin Sheffield
Defendant:
Mark Allen Kingsbury, First Bank of Pike, Margaret Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02641
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Callaway-Ingram v. Pike County, Georgia et al
as 3:2013cv00203
Plaintiff:
Marcia Callaway-Ingram
Defendant:
Pike County, Georgia , Bill Sawyer , Doug Mangham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
