Cases 11 - 20 of 27
BRYMER v. PILOT TRAVEL CENTERS LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00106
Plaintiff:
Robert Brymer and PILOT TRAVEL CENTERS LLC DBA PILOT FLYING J
Defendant:
ARBY'S RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. and PILOT TRAVEL CENTERS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
MAAHS et al v. PILOT TRAVEL CENTERS LLC DBA PILOT FLYING J
as 1:2018cv03261
Plaintiff:
LOUIS MAAHS and JEANNETTE MAAHS
Defendant:
PILOT TRAVEL CENTERS LLC DBA PILOT FLYING J and PILOT TRAVEL CENTERS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YODER v. PILOT TRAVEL CENTERS LLC
as 3:2016cv00221
Defendant:
PILOT TRAVEL CENTERS LLC
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER YODER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
YODER v. PILOT TRAVEL CENTERS LLC
as 3:2016cv00222
Defendant:
PILOT TRAVEL CENTERS LLC
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER YODER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Topalov v. Pilot Travel Centers, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00391
Plaintiff:
Nedyalko Topalov
Defendant:
Pilot Travel Centers, LLC and Mountain Ventures TC Hebron LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. Pilot Travel Centers, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00390
Defendant:
Pilot Travel Centers, LLC and Mountain Ventures TC Hebron LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jarrett v. Pilot Travel Centers, LLC
as 3:2014cv01595
Defendant:
Pilot Travel Centers, LLC
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jarrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LITES v. PILOT TRAVEL CENTERS LLC
as 1:2014cv00801
Plaintiff:
LARRY LITES
Defendant:
PILOT TRAVEL CENTERS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00582
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
