Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Montgomery v. Lieal et al
as 1:2016cv02629
Plaintiff:
David Michael Montgomery
Defendant:
Mr. Lieal, Anne Arundel County Annapolis Detention Center, Officer Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. USA - 2255
as 1:2016cv02100
Petitioner:
Lydell Pittman
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv03406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Unum Life Insurance Company of America v. Pittman
as 1:2014cv01442
Plaintiff:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
John D. Pittman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rogers v. Pittman
as 8:2013cv01983
Plaintiff:
Alford Rogers
Defendant:
Arthur Pittman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Potomac Conference Corporation of Seventh-day Adventists v. Takoma Academy Alumni Association, Inc. et al
as 8:2013cv01128
Plaintiff:
Potomac Conference Corporation of Seventh-day Adventists
Defendant:
Takoma Academy Alumni Association, Inc. and Henry Pittman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
El-Amin v. International Longshoremen's Association, Local #333, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00820
Plaintiff:
Melvin Abdullah El-Amin
Defendant:
International Longshoremen's Association, Local #333, Inc. , International Longshoremen's Association, AFL-CIO , Harold J. Daggett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
