Cases 11 - 20 of 33
RANBAXY, INC. v. DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS PLAINTIFFS
as 1:2014cv14096
Petitioner:
Ranbaxy Inc.
Respondent:
Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
NEXIUM (ESOMEPRAZOLE MAGNESIUM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 1:2014mc91253
Movant:
USHA SANKARAN , ROBERT G. SHEPHERD , JOSEPH TODISCO and others
Respondent:
ALL PLAINTIFFS IN IN RE NEXIUM (ESOMEPRAZOLE MAGNESIUM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION, MDL NO. 2409
IN RE: NEXIUM (ESOMEPRAZOLE MAGNESIUM)
as 1:2014mc91314
Movant:
LISA JOSE FALES
Plaintiff:
Plaintiffs
In Re: Telexfree Securities Litigation
as 4:2014md02566
Plaintiff:
UKACHI OKEHIE, Stanley Onyeabo, Paulo Eduardo Ferrari and others
Defendant:
Doe Payment Processing Services, Babener & Associates, Doe Inside Promoters and others
Petitioner:
Lee M. Pollack
Interested Party:
Interim Lead Counsel and Plaintiffs' Interim Executive Committee, United States of America, Michael Montalvo and others
In Re:
Telexfree Securities Litigation and Robert J. Bonsignore
Intervenor:
Stephen B. Darr as Trustee of the Chapter 11 Estates of TelexFree, Inc. and TelexFree, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re Solodyn (Minocycline Hydrochloride) Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2014md02503
Plaintiff:
Sheet Metal Workers Local No. 25 Health & Welfare Fund, United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund, Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31 and others
Not Classified By Court:
National Medical Health Card Systems, Inc., California Physicians' Service d/b/a Blue Shield of California, United HealthCare Services, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Barr Laboratories, Inc., Matrix Laboratories Ltd., Ranbaxy Laboratories, LTD and others
In Re:
Solodyn (Minocycline Hydrochloride) Antitrust Litigation
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Consolidated Plaintiffs
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014md02513
Consolidated_plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332
In re: NeuroGrafix ('360) Patent Litigation
as 1:2013md02432
Defendant:
St. Mary's Health Care System, Inc., The University of Chicago, Brainlab Medizinische Computersysteme GmbH and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Consolidated Plaintiffs
In Re:
NeuroGrafix ('360) Patent Litigation
Consolidated Defendant:
Consolidated Defendants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
In Re: Fresenius Granuflo/Naturalyte Dialysate Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2013md02428
Plaintiff:
Richard Price, Sr., Antonio McCollum, Henry C Wiggins and others
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiffs' Steering Committee, Plaintiffs' Executive Committee, Plaintiffs' Federal-State Liaison Counsel for Massachusetts and others
Defendant:
Fresenius USA Marketing, Inc., Fresenius USA Sales, Inc., Dialysis Clinic, Inc. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Louisiana Health Service and Indemnity Company d/b/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana
In Re:
Fresenius Granuflo/Naturalyte Dialysate Products Liability Litigation
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Consolidated Plaintiffs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In Re: New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2013md02419
Defendant:
Alaunus Pharmaceutical, LLC , New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. , Ameridose LLC and others
Consolidated_plaintiff:
Consolidated Plaintiffs
Plaintiff:
Edward Adams , George, Cary, individually and as the personal representative of the Estate of Lilian Cary , Robert Schroder and others
Trustee:
Paul D. Moore, in his capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee of the Defendant New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a New England Compounding Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Vasa v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2013cv10099
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. , Plaza Home Mortgage, Inc. , GNMA1 BANA 2936 PLS and others
Plaintiff:
Glen Vasa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
