Cases 11 - 20 of 28
State of Texas, et al v. EPA, et al
as 16-60118
Petitioner:
STATE OF TEXAS, TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and GINA MCCARTHY, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
MS Delta Energy Agency, et al v. FERC
as 14-1030
Petitioner:
Mississippi Delta Energy Agency, Clarksdale Public Utilities Commission, Public Service Commission of Yazoo City and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor:
Public Utility Commission of Texas
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Arkansas Public Service Commission, Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc., Council of the City of New Orleans, Louisiana and others
Exelon Wind 1, L.L.C., et al v. Donna Nelson, et al
as 12-51228
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EXELON WIND 1, L.L.C., formerly known as JD Wind 1, L.L.C., EXELON WIND 2, L.L.C., JD Wind 2, L.L.C., EXELON WIND 3, L.L.C., formerly known as JD Wind 3, L.L.C. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
DONNA NELSON, in her official capacity as Chairman of the Public Utility Commission of Texas, KENNETH W. ANDERSON, JR., in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Public Utility Commission of Texas and ROLANDO PABLOS, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Public Utility Commission of Texas
Intervenor Defendant - Appellant:
SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY and OCCIDENTAL PERMIAN, LIMITED
Exelon Wind 1, L.L.C. v. Donna Nelson
as 12-51230
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EXELON WIND 1, L.L.C., formerly known as JD Wind 1, L.L.C.
Defendant - Appellant:
DONNA NELSON, in her official capacity as Chairman of the Public Utility Commission of Texas
Exelon Wind 1, L.L.C. v. Donna Nelson
as 12-51229
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EXELON WIND 1, L.L.C., formerly known as JD Wind 1, L.L.C.
Defendant - Appellant:
DONNA NELSON, in her official capacity as Chairman of the Public Utility Commission of Texas
Time Warner Cable, Inc., et al v. Paul Hudson, et al
as 12-50496
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIME WARNER CABLE and TEXAS CABLE ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL HUDSON, In His Official Capacity as Chairman of the Public Utility Commission of Texas, JULIE PARSLEY, in Her Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Public Utility Commission of Texas and BARRY SMITHERMAN, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Public Utility Commission of Texas
Intervenor Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS COALITION OF CITIES FOR UTILITY ISSUES, GTE SOUTHWEST INC, doing business as Verizon Southwest, SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE LP, doing business as SBC Texas and others
In re: Time Warner Cable, Inc., et al
as 12-50332
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: TIME WARNER CABLE INC and TEXAS CABLE ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Respondent:
PAUL HUDSON, in His Official Capacity as Chairman of the Public Utility Commission of Texas, JULIE PARSLEY, in Her Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Public Utility Commission of Texas and BARRY SMITHERMAN, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Public Utility Commission of Texas
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01081
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Notice Only Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01082
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Notice Only Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
State of Texas, et al v. EPA, et al
as 11-1338
Petitioner:
State of Texas, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Public Utility Commission of Texas and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Lisa Perez Jackson
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
American Lung Association
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
