Cases 11 - 20 of 93
VONDERHEIDE v. THE HARRISBURG AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE et al
as 5:2019cv03096
Plaintiff:
BENNETT J. VONDERHEIDE and DADDY JUSTICE
Defendant:
SARA CRILL, MATTHEW CRILL, JOHN J. SYGIELSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
VANGJELI v. QUINONES ALEJANDRO, J.
as 2:2018cv03316
Plaintiff:
SUZANA VANGJELI
Defendant:
JUDGE: QUINONES ALEJANDRO, J.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2018cv00747
Plaintiff:
JASON L. BROWN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, LEGROME D. DAVIS, PETRESE B. TUCKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
RIVERA-QUINONES v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 5:2017cv04769
Petitioner:
JOSE A. RIVERA-QUINONES
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
QUINONES-CAMACHO v. WERNER
as 5:2017cv04467
Plaintiff:
ALICE QUINONES-CAMACHO
Defendant:
BRIAN WERNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOUGHERTY v. QUINONES et al
as 2:2017cv03782
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOUGHERTY
Defendant:
SARAH QUINONES and RAFAEL LOPEZ-AVILES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
ABDULLAH v. PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 2:2017cv03618
Plaintiff:
MALIK ABDULLAH
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Movant:
PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES , CEARA HOLMES , OFFICER VAZQUEZ #4782 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Quinones Guzman v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv01222
Plaintiff:
Shakira Quinones Guzman
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ABDULLAH v. PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2017cv02961
Plaintiff:
MALIK ABDULLAH
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
