Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Williams v. Oldham et al
as 2:2013cv02373
Plaintiff:
Raynell Williams
Defendant:
Bill Oldham, Robert Moore, McGee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gibbs v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2013cv00350
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Gibbs, Jr.
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Daniel Pritchard, Cecile N. Casey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. United States of America
as 2:2012cv00073
Petitioner:
William R. Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Russ v. Shelby Co. Justice Center et al
as 2:2011cv02180
Plaintiff:
Everett L. Russ
Defendant:
Shelby Co. Justice Center, Aramark Food Service, C. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arbogast et al v. Glaxosmithkline, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv02134
Plaintiff:
Teena Arbogast, Martha M. Boyd, Jeremy Brooks and others
Defendant:
Glaxosmithkline, LLC, Glaxosmithkline, LLC, Glaxosmithkline Consumer Healthcare LLC and others
Miscellaneou:
Judy Billings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Jones v. United States of America
as 2:2008cv00009
Plaintiff:
William R. Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Vick v. Scott et al
as 1:2007cv01196
Plaintiff:
Jasper Lee Vick
Defendant:
Michael Scott, R. Jones, P. Poplar/Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 2:2007cv02392
Plaintiff:
Arthur R Jones and Arthur R Jones
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company and Norfolk Southern Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jones et al v. Bollinger
as 3:2007mc00026
Plaintiff:
William R. Jones and Joshua M. Cohen
Defendant:
Gene Bollinger
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
