Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Peele v. Rapp et al
as 3:2013cv01854
Petitioner:
Tyrone Peele
Respondent:
Rapp, Kalski and PA State Attorney General
Defendant:
K. P. Reisinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RAPP v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv41263
Plaintiff:
VICTOR J. RAPP
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
RAPP v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72307
Plaintiff:
VICTOR J. RAPP
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAPP V. ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, ET AL
as 2:2010cv68451
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RAPP
Defendant:
ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY , A P GREEN REFRACTORIES COMPANY, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hanson v. Rapp et al
as 4:2010cv00449
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hanson
Defendant:
Rapp and McNeal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson v. Dauphin County Public Defender et al
as 1:2009cv02066
Plaintiff:
Purnell R. Nelson
Defendant:
Dauphin County Public Defender, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Kenneth A. Rapp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Rapp
as 1:2009cv02011
Plaintiff:
Purnell R. Nelson
Defendant:
Kenneth A. Rapp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAFFENSBERGER v. MOYER et al
as 2:2009cv04758
Plaintiff:
WARREN RAFFENSBERGER
Defendant:
SUSAN E. MOYER, CHARLES E. HAUGH, STEPHEN W. ENGLERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Upshur v. Department of Justice Dauphin County Division et al
as 1:2009cv00757
Plaintiff:
Albert William Upshur
Defendant:
Department of Justice Dauphin County Division, Roanld D. Castille, Joseph H. Kleinfelter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
