Cases 11 - 18 of 18
FIGARO JR. v. BUMB et al
as 3:2022cv05385
Plaintiff:
SEAN FIGARO JR.
Defendant:
RENEE MARIE BUMB, KRISTEN M. HARBERG and DIANA V. CARRIG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING, JR. v. BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC et al
as 2:2022cv04981
Plaintiff:
JERRY L. KING, JR.
Defendant:
BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC, MICHAEL BROCK, JASON BRANHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KING, JR. v. BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC et al
as 1:2022cv04981
Plaintiff:
JERRY L. KING, JR.
Defendant:
BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC, MICHAEL BROCK, JASON BRANHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION v. UNITED STATES et al
as 3:2022cv02399
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, MERICK B GARLAND, CHIEF JUDGE MICHAEL A CHAGARES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
FIGARO v. BUMB
as 2:2021cv13157
Plaintiff:
SEAN FIGARO
Defendant:
RENEE MARIE BUMB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RODRIGUEZ v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv19246
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BAR ASSOCIATION, THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION, THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT and others
Plaintiff:
JEAN EMMANUEL RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. BUMB et al
as 3:2015cv06554
Petitioner:
JAMES ROUDABUSH, JR.
Respondent:
RENEE MARIE BUMB, J. HOLLINGSWORTH, C.E. SAMUELS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MULTIJURISDICTION PRACTICE et al v. JEROME B. SIMANDLE et al
as 1:2014cv03678
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MULTIJURISDICTION PRACTICE , ROBERT VEREB and BENJAMIN JOSEF DOSCHER
Defendant:
JEROME B. SIMANDLE, MARY L. COOPER, JOEL A. PISANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
