Cases 11 - 20 of 94
Richard Evans v. S. Sherman, et al
as 21-15177
Defendant / Appellee:
T. CISNEROS, Chief Deputy Warden, FIGEROA, E-Yard Librarian, J. OURIQUE, E-Yard Captain and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD A. EVANS
Evans et al v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2020cv06603
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
ELLEN LORRAINE EVANS and RICHARD PAUL EVANS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Richard Evans v. CDCR
as 20-16945
Defendant / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD A. EVANS
Richard Evans v. Suisun Police Department, et al
as 20-16912
Defendant / Appellee:
SUISUN POLICE DEPARTMENT, STEPHEN BROWN, Officer, LISA CARLOCK, Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD A. EVANS
(PC)Richard A. Evans v. Shittu et al
as 1:2020cv01317
Defendant:
Dawn Teal, Pauline Gladney, Adekunie Shittu and others
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Evans v. Lisa Carlock, et al
as 20-16737
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHEN BROWN, Suisun Police Department, JEFFREY TAUBER, Judge, LISA CARLOCK, Suisun Police Department and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD A. EVANS
Richard Evans v. Sherie Korneman
as 20-2290
Respondent / Appellee:
Sherie Korneman
Petitioner / Appellant:
Richard L. Evans
EVANS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv07401
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J EVANS
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EVANS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv02289
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALLEN EVANS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EVANS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv81520
Plaintiff:
RICHARD EARL EVANS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
