Cases 11 - 20 of 73
Robinson v. Jeffreys
as 8:2023cv00419
Plaintiff:
Kirk D. Robinson
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Mellor
as 8:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
Kirk D. Robinson
Defendant:
Darla Ideus and Matthew Mellor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Brinegar
as 8:2023cv00383
Plaintiff:
Kirk D. Robinson
Defendant:
D. Branden Brinegar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Locust
as 8:2023cv00382
Plaintiff:
Kirk D. Robinson
Defendant:
John Locust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. State of Nebraska
as 8:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Kirk Robinson
Defendant:
State of Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Dakota County Corrections
as 8:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
Darwin Jay Robinson, Jr.
Defendant:
Dakota County Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Madsen et al
as 8:2023cv00277
Plaintiff:
Kirk D. Robinson
Defendant:
Madsen, Lt. Anderson, Cpt. Betts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Carson et al
as 8:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
Kirk D. Robinson
Defendant:
Ryan Carson, John Marsh, Gerald Jorgensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska et al v. Thurston County, Nebraska et al
as 8:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska, Omaha Tribe of Nebraska, Victoria Kitcheyan and others
Defendant:
Thurston County, Nebraska, Thurston County Board of Supervisors, Mark English and others
Counter Claimant:
Glenn Meyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. State of Nebraska
as 8:2022cv00412
Petitioner:
Kirk D. Robinson
Respondent:
State of Nebraska
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
