Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Jones #219406 v. Sage et al
as 1:2015cv00360
Plaintiff:
Daron Jones #219406
Defendant:
G. Sage and Unknown Rowland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bostrom #647630 v. Rowland et al
as 1:2015cv00336
Plaintiff:
John Bostrom #647630
Defendant:
J. Rowland, Kenneth McKee, D. Pepper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dowd et al v. DirectTV, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv14018
Plaintiff:
Donald Dowd , Robert Athan , Gary Foster and others
Defendant:
DirectTV, Inc., DirectTV, LLC, Multiband Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Hunt v. Sierra et al
as 2:2012cv14672
Plaintiff:
Lakeita J. Hunt
Defendant:
Ariel Sierra , WW Rowland and Ariel Freight
United States of America v. Rowland
as 1:2011mj30356
Defendant:
Van Rowland, Jr.
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Rowland
as 1:2011mj30356
Defendant:
Van Rowland, Jr.
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Portis #191775 v. Caruso et al
as 1:2009cv00846
Plaintiff:
Preston Portis #191775, Jr.
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Innovation Ventures, LLC v. Treeline Development Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv10207
Plaintiff:
Innovation Ventures, LLC and Innovation Ventures, LLC
Defendant:
Treeline Development Corporation and Edward J Rowland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Innovation Ventures, LLC v. Treeline Development Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv10206
Plaintiff:
Innovation Ventures, LLC
Consol Plaintiff:
Patrick M McCarthy
Defendant:
Treeline Development Corporation and Edward J Rowland
Consol Defendant:
Leonard K Berman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Rowland v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2008cv00480
Plaintiff:
Stacy Rowland
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
