Cases 11 - 20 of 140
Rutledge v. Acushnet Company et al
as 3:2022cv02045
Plaintiff:
Michael Rutledge
Defendant:
Acushnet Company, Lyn Miles and Does 1 to 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 ea Removal- Employment Discrimination (Age)
Rutledge v. Martinez
as 3:2022cv05563
Petitioner:
Eugene Darrel Rutledge
Respondent:
A. L. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00898
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ed Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Rutledge v. Martinez
as 3:2022cv02516
Petitioner:
Eugene Darrel Rutledge
Respondent:
A. L. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frontier Properties LLC v. Rutledge et al
as 2:2022cv00991
Plaintiff:
Frontier Properties LLC
Defendant:
Solange Rutledge Indiv doing business as One Step Forward Inc. and DOES 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Frontier Properties LLC v. Solange Rutledge et al
as 2:2022cv00528
Plaintiff:
Frontier Properties LLC
Defendant:
Solange Rutledge Individual doing business as One Step Forward, Inc and Does 1 to 10
Rutledge v. Monsanto et al
as 3:2021cv03164
Plaintiff:
Donald Rutledge
Defendant:
Monsanto, Nouryan Surface Chemicals, Akzo Nobel Functional Chemicals LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Augustine et al v. Welch Foods, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00332
Defendant:
Welch Foods, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Matthew Rutledge, Adriana McCloria and Jessica Augustine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1453
Solange Rutledge et al v. Invitation Homes et al
as 2:2020cv08790
Plaintiff:
. SOLANGE RUTLEDGE, Cooley Phillip, Phillip Cooley and others
Defendant:
Southern California Edison Company, 2017-2-IH Borrower LP, Does 1 through 10 and others
COOLEY et al
as 2:2020cv08755
Plaintiff:
SOLANGE RUTLEDGE and PHILLIP COOLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
