Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Gavin et al v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00212
Plaintiff:
Sherron Gavin , Leafa Ah Soon , Elaine Arreaga and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. , Imerys Talc America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv02910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Henderson et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 4:2016cv00283
Plaintiff:
Curtis Henderson , Carl Boyd , Michael Chatman and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nationwide Affinity Insurance Company v. Rutledge et al
as 4:2015cv01757
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Affinity Insurance Company
Defendant:
Rebekah Rutledge and Joseph P. Ludwinski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyd v. Rutledge
as 2:2015cv04008
Plaintiff:
Jennie Boyd
Defendant:
K.J. Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buyak et al v. Organon USA Inc et al
as 4:2013cv01967
Plaintiff:
Desirae Buyak , Tracy Hughes , Krystle Tanner and others
Defendant:
Organon USA Inc , Organon Pharmaceutical USA Inc , Organon International Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rutledge v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv01908
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Rutledge
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rutledge et al v. Bough et al
as 6:2010cv03423
Defendant:
National Casualty Company and Charles Bough
Plaintiff:
Shelly Rutledge and Carl Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lindquist v. Rutledge et al
as 2:2009cv00040
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Lindquist
Defendant:
William J. Rutledge, William J. Rutledge, Scott Duane Donner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Rutledge v. Astrue
as 4:2009cv00600
Plaintiff:
Brinda Jo Rutledge
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
