Cases 11 - 20 of 267
Ramirez v. Sage
as 4:2022cv01978
Petitioner:
Wilson Ramirez
Respondent:
Warden J. Sage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Petruzzi v. Texidor Transport, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv04097
Plaintiff:
JAMES P. PETRUZZI
Defendant:
TEXIDOR TRANSPORT, LLC and OSCAR TEXIDOR-RAMIREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
HICKEY v. TEXIDOR-RAMIREZ et al
as 2:2022cv03950
Plaintiff:
PATRICK HICKEY
Cross Claimant:
OSCAR TEXIDOR-RAMIREZ
Defendant:
TEXIDOR TRANSPORT, LLC and JAMES PETRUZZI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
IN RE: RAMIREZ
as 5:2022cv03687
In Re:
MARIO RAMIREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ali et al v. Ramirez
as 3:2022cv01208
Plaintiff:
Yashoda Ali and Javed Ali
Defendant:
Ana D. Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ramirez v. Philips North America LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00769
Plaintiff:
Abran Ramirez
Defendant:
PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, Philips Holding USA, Inc., PHILIPS R.S. NORTH AMERICA, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ramirez v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv00797
Plaintiff:
Modesto Ramirez
Defendant:
United States, J. Meyers, National Gang Unit Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Ransom et al
as 1:2022cv00651
Petitioner:
Robert Ramirez
Respondent:
Kevin Ransom, George Little and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez v. Sage
as 1:2022cv00638
Petitioner:
Raul S. Ramirez
Respondent:
Warden J. Sage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramirez v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00431
Plaintiff:
Marlem Tinoco Ramirez
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
