Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Lee v. Givens, et al(INMATE 3) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00471
Plaintiff: Rashad C. Lee
Defendant: Gwendolyn Givens and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lee v. Givens et al (INMATE 3) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00472
Plaintiff: Rashad C. Lee
Defendant: Gwendolyn Givens and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Rashad Lee
as 17-10806
Petitioner: In re: RASHAD C. LEE
Successive Habeas Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Lee v. Peterson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00625
Plaintiff: Rashad C. Lee
Defendant: Kenneth Peterson, Kevin Bishop and Captain Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rashad Lee v. Dewayne Estes, et al
as 13-15831
Petitioner - Appellant: RASHAD C. LEE
Respondent - Appellee: DEWAYNE ESTES and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Lee v. Estes (INMATE 3) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00797
Plaintiff: Rashad C. Lee
Defendant: Dewayne Estes and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lee v. Estes
as 2:2013cv01377
Petitioner: Rashad C Lee
Respondent: Dewayne Estes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Thomas et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013cv01365
Plaintiff: Rashad C Lee
Defendant: Kim Thomas, James Deloach, Grant Culliver and others
Miscellaneou: staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Rashad Lee
as 13-12326
Petitioner: In re: RASHAD C. LEE
Successive Habeas Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv01119
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?