Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ratliff v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv00975
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Ratliff
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ratliff v. CR Bard et al
as 2:2020cv01838
Plaintiff:
Terry Ratliff
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., CR Bard and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ratliff v. C.R. Bard, Inc et al
as 2:2020cv01025
Plaintiff:
Guy Ratliff
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. BARD INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02535
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ratliff v. The Ohio State University
as 2:2019cv04746
Defendant:
The Ohio State University
Plaintiff:
Rocky Ratliff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ratliff v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2018cv00884
Defendant:
Davol Inc, Does 1 - 20, C R Bard Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Freddie Ratliff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In re: Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2018md02846
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation, C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Pauline R Currey, Gerald Lane, Abraham Furleiter and others
Interested Party:
David Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Ratliffe v. Cuyahoga County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2016cv01923
Petitioner:
Roberta Ratliffe
Respondent:
Cuyahoga County Sheriff Department, Ohio Department of Rehabilation and Corrections and ODRC Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ratliff v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02118
Plaintiff:
Norma Jean Ratliff
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
