Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Ratliff CPA Firm PC v. First Reliance Bank et al
as 2:2020cv02208
Defendant:
First Reliance Bank and Does 1 through 100
Plaintiff:
Ratliff CPA Firm PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ratliff CPA Firm PC v. Truist Bank et al
as 2:2020cv02207
Defendant:
Truist Bank and Does 1 through 100
Plaintiff:
Ratliff CPA Firm PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ratliff CPA Firm PC v. Pinnacle Bank et al
as 2:2020cv02225
Plaintiff:
Ratliff CPA Firm PC
Defendant:
Pinnacle Bank and Does 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ratliff et al v. Avon Products Inc et al
as 7:2019cv02570
Defendant:
Coty Inc, Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, Breentag Specialties Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Ennis Ratliff and Lynda Ratliff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cynthia Faye Davis et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03399
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Faye Davis , Barbara J. Adams , Terry M. Anders and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ratliff v. State of South Carolina
as 5:2016cv03313
Petitioner:
Richard David Ratliff
Respondent:
Warden, Lee Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
High v. Moss et al
as 7:2014cv03597
Plaintiff:
Barbara Joan High
Defendant:
Bruce E Moss, Tammy F Moss , Ally Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ratliff v. Darlington County Clerk of Court's
as 4:2014cv00746
Petitioner:
Jessie Ratliff
Respondent:
Warden Evans Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Magwood v. City of Charleston Police Dept et al
as 2:2013cv02244
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Magwood
Defendant:
City of Charleston Police Dept, Charleston County Sheriffs Office, Jennifer Haberstadt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Childress v. City of Charleston Police Department et al
as 2:2013cv01225
Plaintiff:
Tessa R R G C Childress
Defendant:
City of Charleston Police Department, Chito T Walker, Officer Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
