Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Wiliam Raymundo-Rodriguez v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.
as 14-1901
Petitioner:
Wiliam Aroldo Raymundo-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-56920
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Raymundo Rodriguez
as 13-50677
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAYMUNDO RODRIGUEZ
Rodriguez v. Cheung Cheung et al
as 1:2013cv02173
Defendant:
Kee Cheung Cheung and Thunder Group New York, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Julio Raymundo Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Rodriguez v. Cheung Cheung et al
as 1:2012cv09246
Plaintiff:
Julio Raymundo Rodriguez
Defendant:
Kee Cheung Cheung and Thunder Group New York, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Los Reyes Mexican Restaurant, LLC et al
as 4:2011cv03977
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Los Reyes Mexican Restaurant, LLC, Luis Lopez and Raymundo Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0521
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Los Reyes Mexican Restaurant, LLC et al
as 4:2011cv03932
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Los Reyes Mexican Restaurant, LLC, Luis Lopez and Raymundo Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0521
USA v. Raymundo Rodriguez-Jimenez
as 11-10414
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMUNDO RODRIGUEZ-JIMENEZ
Rodriguez-Fernandez v. Colodny et al
as 1:2011cv21484
Plaintiff:
Raymundo Rodriguez-Fernandez
Defendant:
Yvonne Colodny, Andrew Edwards and Fred Modovan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodriguez-Fernandez v. Colodny et al
as 1:2011cv21191
Plaintiff:
Raymundo Rodriguez-Fernandez
Defendant:
Yvonne Colodny, Andrew Edwards and Fred Modovan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
