Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 11 - 20 of 32
REDMOND v. UPCHURCH
as 1:2017cv00183
Plaintiff: JOHN H. REDMOND, IV
Defendant: T. UPCHURCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REDMOND v. RITCHIE
as 1:2017cv00188
Plaintiff: JOHN H. REDMOND, IV
Defendant: D. RITCHIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REDMOND v. PALMER
as 1:2017cv00184
Defendant: DEPUTY SHERIFF PALMER
Plaintiff: JOHN H. REDMOND, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REDMOND v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00109
Defendant: CLOE, T. AARON COX, CASSANDRA FEASTER and others
Plaintiff: JOHN H. REDMOND, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCARR v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv02605
Defendant: JULIAN CASTRO, FEIWELL AND HANNOY PC, CAROL J. GALANTE and others
Plaintiff: KIMBALL RUSTIN ROY SCARR
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
REDMOND v. USA
as 3:2016cv00099
Petitioner: MICHAEL REDMOND
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
REDMOND v. COX et al
as 1:2016cv00311
Defendant: AARON COX, HILSON and ROBERT STAFFORD
Plaintiff: JOHN H. REDMOND, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REDMOND v. UPCHURCH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00257
Defendant: PALMER and UPCHURCH
Plaintiff: JOHN H. REDMOND, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REDMOND v. SIDWELL et al
as 1:2015cv01094
Defendant: CASSANDRA FEASTER, H. GARDNER and RICHARD SIDWELL
Plaintiff: JOHN H. REDMOND, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REDMOND v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2014cv01808
Defendant: DHB CHAIRWOMAN, WENDY KNIGHT and WILLIAMS
Plaintiff: JOHN H. REDMOND, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?