Cases 11 - 20 of 56
Renfro v. Kroger Texas, LP
as 3:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
Gary Renfro
Defendant:
Kroger Texas L.P. and Kroger Texas, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2022cv01928
Plaintiff:
Gary Renfro and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Kroger Texas L.P.
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01813
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Renfro v. Baker et al
as 4:2021cv02172
Defendant:
Bruce Fredricks, Dale Wainwright, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Plaintiff:
Rashard Esaw Renfro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Renfro v. Lumpkin et al
as 1:2021cv00049
Defendant:
James M. Cooper, Jonathan S. Joseph, Onyemuche E. Ogu and others
Plaintiff:
Rashard Esaw Renfro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hal D. Renfro & Callister Investments, A California General Partnership v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
as 5:2021cv00008
Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
HAL D. RENFRO & CALLISTER INVESTMENTS, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP and Hal D. Renfro & Callister Investments, A Calfornia General Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00876
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
RENFROE v. CGT U.S. LIMITED
as 5:2020cv00559
Defendant:
CGT U.S. LIMITED
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY RENFROE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Webb et al v. Tarar
as 3:2020cv00398
Plaintiff:
Linda Gail Webb, subrogee of Renfro Street Holdings, Ltd and HDI Global Specialty SE
Defendant:
Abdul Wahid Tarar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Renfro v. Harmon et al
as 4:2019cv04803
Plaintiff:
Levite Renfro
Defendant:
Aramark, District Atty of Court 176 and Judge Nikita V Harmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
