Cases 11 - 20 of 43
MURPHY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv05710
Petitioner:
RICHARD C. MURPHY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SINGH RADCLIFF v. RADCLIFF et al
as 1:2020cv03669
Defendant:
DR. KRISTEN RADCLIFF, JOHN DOES I-V, COOPER LEVENSON, P.A. and others
Plaintiff:
DR. NINA SINGH RADCLIFF
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511
KANG v. SIVILLI et al
as 2:2019cv22080
Defendant:
Xiaoyu (Cindy) Chen, Richard C. Sherman, MARY JEAN GALLAGHER and others
Plaintiff:
KAI KANG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DICKERSON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv19078
Plaintiff:
RICHARD C. DICKERSON and THE ESTATE OF CAROLYN D. DICKERSON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHAN et al v. GORMALLY et al
as 2:2019cv04989
Defendant:
GARY M. RAUCH, RAZA BOKHARI, JOHN J. GORMALLY and others
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY CHAN, JASMINE HENDERSON and DON DANESH WIJESEKERA
WATTS v. AKERS BIOSCIENCES, INC.
as 2:2018cv15992
Defendant:
GARY M. RAUCH, JOHN J. GORMALLY, Bill J. White and others
Plaintiff:
CALE WATTS
BOONE et al v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS, L.P. et al
as 2:2017cv07545
Plaintiff:
RICHARD C. BOONE and GLYNIS BOONE
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS, L.P. and ASTRAZENECA LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WADDY et al v. NEW STAR LOGISTICS, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv06326
Defendant:
CHARANJIT SINGH, CHARANJIT SINGH GREWAL, NEW STAR LOGISTICS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
PARIS WILLIAMS, LARRY MARTIN, MAYA WILLIAMS and others
Arbitrator:
RICHARD C. CAMP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
HILL v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC et al
as 3:2017cv02845
Plaintiff:
RICHARD C HILL, JR.
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC, JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
