Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Robert Decker v. Brian Lammer
as 23-2179
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROBERT K. DECKER
Defendant / Appellee: BRIAN LAMMER, Warden
Robert Decker v. Katherine Sireveld, et al
as 23-1725
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROBERT K. DECKER
Defendant / Appellee: KATHERINE SIREVELD, Legal Deprtment of terre Haute & Marion F.C.I.'s, MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States, MICHAEL CARVAJAL and others
Robert Decker v. Dan Sproul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-1585
Petitioner / Appellant: ROBERT K. DECKER
Respondent / Appellee: DAN SPROUL
DECKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00101
Plaintiff: ROBERT K. DECKER
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
DECKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv00085
Plaintiff: ROBERT K. DECKER
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COLLETTE PETERS, SARA QURESHI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
DECKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv00065
Plaintiff: ROBERT K. DECKER
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BOOTH, POINTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
DECKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv00077
Plaintiff: ROBERT K. DECKER
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JONES, TRUEBLOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Decker v. Sproul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00199
Petitioner: Robert K. Decker
Respondent: Daniel Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Decker v. Sproul
as 3:2023cv00045
Petitioner: Robert K. Decker
Respondent: Dan Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DECKER v. RULE
as 2:2022cv00475
Petitioner: ROBERT K. DECKER
Respondent: RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?