Cases 11 - 15 of 15
National Association for Gun Rights et al v. CIty of Louisville, Colorado
as 1:2022cv02111
Plaintiff:
Rocky Mountain Gun Owners, National Association for Gun Rights, Bryan Lafonte and others
Defendant:
City of Louisville, Colorado
Interested Party:
Town of Superior, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rocky Mountain Gun Owners et al v. Town of Superior, The et al
as 1:2022cv01685
Plaintiff:
Rocky Mountain Gun Owners, National Association for Gun Rights and Charles Bradley Walker
Defendant:
Town of Superior, The and Joe Pelle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rocky Mountain Gun Owners, et al v. Williams, et al
as 15-1336
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROCKY MOUNTAIN GUN OWNERS, a Colorado non-profit corporation and COLORADO CAMPAIGN FOR LIFE, a Colorado non-profit corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
WAYNE W. WILLIAMS, in his official capacity as Secretary for the State of Colorado and CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON, a Delware non-profit corporation, trading as Colorado Ethics Watch, DBA Colorado Ethics Watch
Rocky Mountain Gun Owners, et al v. Williams, et al
as 15-1336
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROCKY MOUNTAIN GUN OWNERS, a Colorado non-profit corporation and COLORADO CAMPAIGN FOR LIFE, a Colorado non-profit corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
WAYNE W. WILLIAMS, in his official capacity as Secretary for the State of Colorado and CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON, a Delware non-profit corporation, trading as Colorado Ethics Watch, DBA Colorado Ethics Watch
Rocky Mountain Gun Owners et al v. Gessler et al
as 1:2014cv02850
Plaintiff:
Rocky Mountain Gun Owners and Colorado Campaign for Life
Defendant:
Scott Gessler and Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
