Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Roddy v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2017cv11336
Plaintiff:
Rosie Roddy
Defendant:
Accord Healthcare, Inc., Hospira, Inc., Sandoz, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
T C F Equipment Finance v. FraCo L L C et al
as 6:2016cv01243
Plaintiff:
T C F Equipment Finance
Defendant:
FraCo L L C, Roddie Trucking L L C and Michael G Francis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wagner v. Hammond City et al
as 2:2016cv01376
Plaintiff:
Bryan T Wagner
Defendant:
Hammond City Jail, Hammond City Police, Hammond City and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roddy v. A B C Insurance Co et al
as 6:2015cv01988
Defendant:
A B C Insurance Co, X Y Z Insurance Co, Nabors Offshore Services and others
Plaintiff:
Romero Roddy
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 1331
Roddy v. Cooper/T.Smith Stevedoring Company, Inc.
as 2:2015cv01696
Defendant:
Cooper/T.Smith Stevedoring Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Preston Roddy
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Payne v. Hammond City et al
as 2:2015cv01022
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L Payne
Defendant:
Hammond City, Roddy Devall, Rodney Gemar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Devall v. Hammond Municipal Fire and Police Civil Service Board et al
as 2:2014cv01381
Plaintiff:
Roddy Devall
Defendant:
Hammond Municipal Fire and Police Civil Service Board , David Danel , Hammond City and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conerly v. Bergeron et al
as 2:2011cv03042
Plaintiff:
Kendrick D Conerly
Defendant:
Roddy Devall, Bryan McCormick, Conn Milton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucas v. Cain et al
as 3:2011cv00730
Respondent:
Burl Cain and James D. Caldwell, Jr.
Petitioner:
Lucas Roddy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pratz v. Lockheed Martin Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv02205
Plaintiff:
Nona Roddy Pratz
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation and Earl Howard Pratz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
