Cases 11 - 20 of 56
TORRES v. BUTCH
as 2:2019cv02597
Plaintiff:
TELESFORO ROJAS TORRES
Defendant:
ROBERT BUTCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez v. Jacques
as 5:2019cv00325
Petitioner:
Hector Rodriguez, Rojas and Victor Rojas
Respondent:
Warden I. Jacques
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROJAS v. NEWMAN et al
as 1:2018cv00371
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT BURTON, SERGEANT RICHTER and LIEUTENANT NEWMAN
Plaintiff:
PETER ROJAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Delloye v. Revolutionary Armed Forces of Columbia et al
as 4:2018cv01307
Defendant:
Alexander Farfan Suarez, Jose Fernando Romero Mejia, Heli Mejia Mendoza and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Delloye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROJAS v. PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2018cv01885
Plaintiff:
MARITZABEL ROJAS
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rojas-Rojas v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv00527
Plaintiff:
Wanda I Rojas-Rojas
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BAKER et al v. PALACE ELITE RESORTS, S.A. DE C.V. et al
as 2:2018cv00319
Plaintiff:
KELSEY T. BAKER and FRANK W. BAKER
Defendant:
PALACE ELITE RESORTS, S.A. DE C.V., MY TIMESHARE OPTIONS, DAN BISHOP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
ROJAS v. CAPOZZA et al
as 5:2017cv03488
Petitioner:
PETER B. ROJAS
Respondent:
MARK CAPOZZA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HOPKINS et al v. GEMBALA
as 2:2015cv03099
Plaintiff:
DAVID L HOPKINS , PAUL DEL PRIORE , SUSAN AUSTIN and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH A. GEMBALA, III
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
ROJAS et al v. ONE STOP PERSONNEL SERVICES, LLP
as 2:2015cv00010
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ROJAS and BRANDELY ROJAS
Defendant:
ONE STOP PERSONNEL SERVICES, LLP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
