Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Rojo v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 9:2017cv00101
Plaintiff:
Raymundo Rojo
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Melendrez-Rojo v. USA
as 4:2016cv00052
Petitioner:
Alberto Melendrez-Rojo
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rojo v. Bancroft & Sons Transportation LLC
as 3:2016cv01181
Plaintiff:
Arturo Rojo
Defendant:
Bancroft & Sons Transportation LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Gomez et al
as 4:2015cv00934
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Osbaldo Gomez, Guadalupe Rojo and Mojitos Restaurant & Bar, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rojo v. State Farm Lloyds et al
as 4:2014cv00684
Plaintiff:
Hector Rojo
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds and David Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rojo-Trevizo v. United States
as 4:2013cv00049
Petitioner:
Luis Rojo-Trevizo
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Nietsche v. Rami Transportation, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00320
Plaintiff:
Brian Nietsche
Defendant:
Rami Transportation, Inc. and Damaso Ervin Rojo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Rojo v. Burger One LLC et al
as 3:2011cv02968
Plaintiff:
Cupertino Jurado Rojo
Defendant:
Burger One LLC and Chris Srivarodom
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Gutierrez v. City of San Antonio Magistrate Office Administration et al
as 5:2011cv00431
Defendant:
Officer Tony Casarez, City of San Antonio Magistrate Office Administration, Magistrate Rolando Ramos and others
Plaintiff:
Jose H. Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
