Cases 11 - 20 of 154
Coit v. Malichaik et al
as 1:2023cv01124
Plaintiff:
Kevin Coit
Defendant:
L. Malichaik, Bobbi Jo Salomon, M. Rowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TIMMONS v. IRWIN, et al.
as 1:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
BRANDON TIMMONS
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT R. IRWIN, SECRETARY LAUREN HARRY, DIRECTOR JAMES BARNACLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MOODY v. HARRY et al
as 3:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
Brandon Moody
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, George Little, Tabb Bickle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOODY v. HARRY et al
as 2:2023cv00770
Plaintiff:
BRANDON MOODY
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, GEORGE LITTLE, TABB BICKLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS v. PENNSYLVANIA CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES et al
as 2:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
TYWAN D. ADAMS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES, DENNIS KAPOLKA and GAIL ROWE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Rowe et al
as 4:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Jerome Junior Washington
Defendant:
DSCS Rowe and Ms. Salamon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIECO v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Defendant:
MICAHEL ZAKEN, MARK HAMMER, WILLIAM NICHOLSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ROTEN v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
ISIAH ANDREW ROTEN
Defendant:
GEORGE LITTLE, TABB BICKELL, MICHAEL ZAKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McKee v. Furguson et al
as 4:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Jamey McKee
Defendant:
T. Furguson, M. Rowe, J. Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Salamon et al
as 1:2022cv01715
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Gonzalez
Defendant:
B. Salamon, Michael Rowe, Richard Ellers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
