Cases 11 - 20 of 92
Varma v. West et al
as 3:2022cv02940
Plaintiff:
Rajeev Varma
Defendant:
David Scott West, Daniel Doolittle, Othniel Doolittle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Carter et al v. Sun Communities, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv02931
Plaintiff:
Joshua Carter and Kristi Carter
Defendant:
Sun Communities, Inc and Sun TRS Lake Rudolph LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rudolph et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, et al
as 1:2022cv05283
Plaintiff:
Alan Rudolph and Brianna Daniels
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK), BNSF Railway Company and National Railroad Passenger Corporation doing business as Amtrak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Varma v. West et al
as 1:2022cv03065
Plaintiff:
Rajeev Varma
Defendant:
David Scott West, Daniel Doolittle, Othniel Doolittle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02904
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02717
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Rudolph-Kimble v. City Chicago Police Department
as 1:2022cv02312
Plaintiff:
Brandon Rudolph-Kimble
Defendant:
City Chicago Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Kim v. Rudolph et al
as 3:2022cv00370
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Kim
Defendant:
John Austin Rudolph and Collaku Enea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
DeVost v. Davis et al
as 3:2022cv03010
Plaintiff:
Melvin DeVost
Defendant:
Dale Davis, Joshua Davis, Matthew Dowis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kim v. Rudolph et al
as 1:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Kim
Defendant:
John Austin Rudolph and Collaku Enea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
