Cases 11 - 17 of 17
UNITED NORTHERN & SOUTHERN KNIGHTS OF THE KU KLUX KLAN v. PROSECUTOR, RUSH COUNTY, INDIANA et al
as 1:2011cv01079
Defendant:
PROSECUTOR, RUSH COUNTY, INDIANA and SHERIFF, RUSH COUNTY, INDIANA
Plaintiff:
UNITED NORTHERN & SOUTHERN KNIGHTS OF THE KU KLUX KLAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STATE OF INDIANA et al v. FIELDS et al
as 1:2010cv01223
Counter Defendant:
MARSHAL RICK BUSH, CARTHAGE TOWN MARSHALL, COUNTY OF RUSH and others
Plaintiff:
CARTHAGE TOWN MARSHALL, COUNTY OF RUSH, RUSH COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. and others
Counter Claimant:
ROBERT F. FIELDS
Defendant:
ROBERT F. FIELDS and SHERIFF JOHN SHERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HURLEY v. INDIANA HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2010cv00913
Defendant:
BATESVILLE COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION, DECATUR COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, FAYETTE COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
TAMMY HURLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Michael Tully v. Paul Barada, Jr., et al
as 09-3237
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL TULLY
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL BARADA, Rush County Prosecutor, in his individual capacity and CATHERINE CUSTER, Rush County Juvenile Probation Officer, in her individual capacity
PARKER v. INDIANA HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2009cv00885
Defendant:
BATESVILLE COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION, DECATUR COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, FAYETTE COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
AMBER PARKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TULLY v. RUSH COUNTY PROSECUTOR PAUL BARADA et al
as 1:2008cv01243
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TULLY
Defendant:
RUSH COUNTY PROSECUTOR PAUL BARADA and RUSH COUNTY JUVENILE PROBATION OFFICER CATHERINE CUSTER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ELLIOTT v. SHERIFF OF RUSH COUNTY, INDIANA et al
as 1:2008cv00480
Plaintiff:
LARZ A. ELLIOTT and LARZ A. ELLIOTT
Defendant:
SHERIFF OF RUSH COUNTY, INDIANA, TERRY L. DRAKE and DOUG KEITH
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
