Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 74
MARVIN et al v. SHARON SAVINGS BANK et al
as 2:2012cv05460
Plaintiff: DONALD MARVIN and SARAH ARCHBOLD
Defendant: SHARON SAVINGS BANK and XYZ CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Transfer Act
ARCHBOLD v. BENEFICIAL SAVINGS BANK We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv04951
Plaintiff: SARAH ARCHBOLD
Defendant: BENEFICIAL SAVINGS BANK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv05425
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2012cv05425
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2012cv05162
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
ARCHBOLD et al v. GRAFTON SUBURBAN CREDIT UNION et al
as 2:2012cv03872
Plaintiff: SARAH ARCHBOLD and DONALD MARVIN
Defendant: GRAFTON SUBURBAN CREDIT UNION, JOHN DOES 1-10 and X, Y, Z CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
ARCHBOLD et al v. SEARS HOLDING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv03875
Plaintiff: SARAH ARCHBOLD and DONALD MARVIN
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-10, SEARS HOLDING CORPORATION and X, Y, Z CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ARCHBOLD et al v. HAMPDEN BANCORP, INC et al
as 2:2012cv03873
Plaintiff: SARAH ARCHBOLD and DONALD MARVIN
Defendant: HAMPDEN BANCORP, INC, HAMPDEN BANK, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ARCHBOLD et al v. MASS MUTUAL FEDERAL CREDIT UNION et al
as 2:2012cv03874
Plaintiff: SARAH ARCHBOLD and DONALD MARVIN
Defendant: MASS MUTUAL FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, JOHN DOES 1-10 and X, Y, Z CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2012cv04141
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?