Cases
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
FAGAN et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD IND. et al
as 2:2009cv69824
Plaintiff: CHARLES A. FAGAN and SHARON FAGAN
Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD IND., GAF CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBER. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
FAGAN et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD IND. et al
as 2:2009cv69822
Plaintiff: CHARLES A. FAGAN and SHARON FAGAN
Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD IND., GAF CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBER. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
FAGAN et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD IND. et al
as 2:2009cv69820
Plaintiff: CHARLES A. FAGAN and SHARON FAGAN
Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD IND., GAF CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBER. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
FAGAN et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD IND. et al
as 2:2009cv69829
Plaintiff: CHARLES A. FAGAN and SHARON FAGAN
Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD IND., GAF CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBER. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
FAGAN et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD IND. et al
as 2:2009cv69823
Plaintiff: CHARLES A. FAGAN and SHARON FAGAN
Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD IND., GAF CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBER. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
FAGAN-ELLISON v. DISABILITY REINSURANCE MANAGEMENT SERVICE INC. et al
as 1:2007cv00422
Plaintiff: SHARON FAGAN-ELLISON
Defendant: DISABILITY REINSURANCE MANAGEMENT SERVICE INC., INDYGO LONGTERM DISABILITY PLAN and BOSTON MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Fagan et al
as 1:2007cv00110
Plaintiff: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant: Sharon Fagan and Hamilton County Treasurer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?