Cases 11 - 20 of 92
Intuniv Antitrust Litigation v. Shire LLC
as 6:2018mc00062
Petitioner:
Laurence F. Doud and Laurence F. Doud, III
In Re:
Intuniv Antitrust Litigation
Defendant:
Shire LLC
Respondent:
Shire PLC and Shire U.S. Inc.
SHIRE LLC et al v. ABHAI, LLC
as 2:2018mc00187
Plaintiff:
SHIRE LLC and SHIRE US INC.
Defendant:
ABHAI, LLC
Shire Development LLC et al v. SpecGx LLC
as 1:2018cv00800
Plaintiff:
Shire Development LLC , Shire LLC and Shire US Inc.
Defendant:
SpecGx LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Shire Development LLC et al v. Impax Laboratories, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00549
Plaintiff:
Shire Development LLC , Shire LLC and Shire US Inc.
Defendant:
Impax Laboratories, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Impax Laboratories, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Shire Development LLC , Shire LLC and Shire US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
LCS Group LLC v. Shire LLC et al
as 1:2018cv02688
Defendant:
Shire PLC, Shire LLC, Shire Development LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LCS Group LLC
Appellant:
Foundation Law Group LLP and Stephen M Lobbin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc
Shire Development LLC et al v. Rhodes Pharmaceuticals L.P.
as 1:2017cv01840
Plaintiff:
Shire LLC, Shire US Inc. and Shire Development LLC
Defendant:
Rhodes Pharmaceuticals L.P.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Shire Development LLC et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01696
Plaintiff:
Shire LLC, Shire US Inc. and Shire Development LLC
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals Industires Limited, Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticlas USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
J M Smith Corporation v. Shire LLC et al
as 1:2017cv10229
Plaintiff:
J M Smith Corporation
Defendant:
Shire LLC and Shire US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Cummisford v. Shire US Inc et al
as 1:2017cv10156
Plaintiff:
Sherri Cummisford
Defendant:
Shire U.S. Inc. , Shire LLC , Actavis Elizabeth LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.