Cases 11 - 15 of 15
Huellemeier v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, LTD et al
as 3:2017cv01938
Plaintiff:
Robert W Huellemeier
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceutical Indus Ltd , Erez Vigodman , Eyal Desheh and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Huellemeier v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, LTD et al
as 1:2017cv00485
Plaintiff:
Robert W Huellemeier
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited, Erez Vigodman, Eyal Desheh and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board, et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al
as 3:2017cv00558
Plaintiff:
Galmi, Amram Galmi, Anchorage Police & Fire Retirement System and others
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, Deborah Griffin, BBVA Securities, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Franklin Investors Securities Trust, Franklin Templeton Investments Corp., Franklin Templeton Investment Funds and others
Interested Party:
East 71, Ltd., Brahman Partners II, L.P., Brahman Partners III, L.P. and others
Petitioner:
Waterford Township Police and Fire Retirement System, Barry Baker, Public School Teachers Pension and Retirement System of Chicago and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Shlomo Yanai, Yitzhak Peterburg, Yaacov Altman and others
Intervenor:
United States of America and HMG Global Initiative Inc.
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Certain funds and accounts managed by TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC and Teachers Advisors LLC, TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC, TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC on behalf of certain of its managed funds and accounts and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Karbash v. Sagent Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv07973
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Karbash
Defendant:
Sagent Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Robert Flanagan, Allan Oberman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Yanay v. Dipietro
as 1:2012cv00507
Plaintiff:
Shlomo Yanay
Defendant:
Michael D. Dipietro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
