Cases 11 - 20 of 272
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
DENHAM v. HITCHED BRANDS, INC et al
as 1:2023cv03655
Plaintiff:
NATHALIE DENHAM
Defendant:
HITCHED BRANDS, INC, Christopher Sammons and Stephanie Lee Apa
FLEMING v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv03203
Petitioner:
STEPHANIE LYNN FLEMING
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FCI DANBURY and BALTIMORE RRM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ISOM v. TEXAS STATE et al
as 1:2023cv02853
Plaintiff:
TYESHA ISOM
Defendant:
TEXAS STATE, CARRI COLE and STEPHANIE MITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MORRIS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2023cv01941
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. MORRIS, JESSE URENA, BRIANNE CROOKS and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
AYELE et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2023cv01785
Plaintiff:
MEDHIN AYELE, STEPHANIE CARRINGTON, SHAWN DARNELL CHEATHAM and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, SHIRLEY KWAN-HUI, SHARON LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
