Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv02331
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Scarborough v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2020cv02267
Plaintiff:
Kimberly P Scarborough
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Stokes v. Miss Scarborough et al
as 9:2020cv01675
Plaintiff:
Charles Michael Stokes
Defendant:
Miss Scarborough, Miss Richardson and Mr. Byrd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone et al v. Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP et al
as 3:2020cv01290
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Ronald Desantis, George B. Wolfe and others
Plaintiff:
Lesa M. Martino, Robert Sarhan and Barbara Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Mack v. Wells Fargo Financial South Carolina, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03335
Defendant:
Carolina Richardson Glenn, Gregory Thomas Whitley, Bradford Meekin Stokes and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Demar Mack
Jones v. Scarborough et al
as 2:2019cv02901
Plaintiff:
Alluette Karen Jones
Defendant:
Andrew Michael Sullivan, Mikell R Scarborough, SRP 2011-6 LLC and others
Wilson v. Belgraier et al
as 2:2019cv02879
Defendant:
Douglas Warning, January O Hearn, Debra Etheridge and others
Plaintiff:
Catwana Michelle Wilson
Tyler, Jr. v. SCDC Classification Department et al
as 2:2019cv01315
Plaintiff:
James C Tyler, Jr.
Defendant:
Kershaw Correctional Institute, SCDC Classification Department and Juliette Scarborough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scarborough et al v. ADT LLC
as 9:2019cv00698
Defendant:
ADT LLC
Plaintiff:
Wallace Scarborough and Catherine Scarborough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowden v. Scarborough et al
as 2:2019cv00655
Defendant:
EAS Sensorense Inc, Mary Scarborough, Others Unknown and others
Plaintiff:
Albertha Bowden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
