Cases 11 - 20 of 22
DAngelo v. Schofield et al
as 7:2011cv00003
Plaintiff:
Campanella DAngelo
Defendant:
Derrick D. Schofield, William Danforth, Ted Philbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Humphrey et al
as 5:2010cv00074
Plaintiff:
Charles Harris
Defendant:
Carl Humphrey, Doug Underwood, Danny Piland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Arrington et al
as 1:2010cv01528
Plaintiff:
Arthur Jones
Defendant:
Stanley Arrington, R. Hall, J. Whitting and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Owens et al
as 4:2009cv00108
Plaintiff:
Charles Harris
Defendant:
Brian Owens, Derrick Schofield, Harris Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Bryant et al v. Perdue et al
as 1:2009cv00027
Plaintiff:
Tarent Bryant, James Peterson, Anthony Stepherson and others
Defendant:
Sonny Perdue, Karen Handel, James Donald and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jackson v. Schofield et al
as 3:2009cv00010
Plaintiff:
Miguel Jackson
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Tim Spires and Joe Burnette
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hill (Death Penalty) v. Schofield
as 1:2004cv00151
Petitioner:
Warren Lee Hill, Jr. and Warren Lee Hill, Jr.
Respondent:
Derrick Schofield
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Moe Dreams, LLC et al v. Sprock et al
as 1:2008cv00196
Plaintiff:
Moe Dreams, LLC, Moe Dreams, LLC, Moe Dreams, LLC and others
Defendant:
H. Martin Sprock, III, Daryl Dollinger, Carl Griffenkranz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jones v. Schofield et al
as 1:2008cv00007
Plaintiff:
Thomas Conway Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Thomas Ammons, Keith Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heard v. Hunt et al
as 1:2007cv03209
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Heard
Defendant:
Garland R. Hunt, L. Gale Buckner, Garfield Hammons, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
