Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Carr v. Sego et al
as 2:2019cv03459
Defendant:
David Ellison, Smallwood Dental Services, Phillip Hendrix and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Allen Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forister #301007 v. Ryan et al
as 4:2019cv00045
Defendant:
Unknown Salyer, Julia Roberts, Unknown Boyd and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Steven Forister
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Withers v. Beecken Petty O'Keefe & Company et al
as 2:2017cv03391
Plaintiff:
Michael V Withers
Defendant:
Beecken Petty O'Keefe & Company, Corizon LLC, Calvin Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Layden v. Moonjelly et al
as 2:2017cv00588
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bartholomew Layden, IV
Defendant:
Annees Moonjelly, Daniel S Sego, Corizon Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foley #072158 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv00378
Plaintiff:
Rick Alton Foley
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan , T Scott, Unknown Silvas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Evans v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv00252
Plaintiff:
Ryan Evans
Defendant:
Charles Ryan, Corizon Correctional Health Incorporated, Kautaushia Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sego v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2016cv04550
Plaintiff:
Terry Eugene Sego
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Unknown Friedman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sandoval v. Corizon LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00728
Plaintiff:
Felipe Sandoval
Defendant:
Corizon LLC, D Spencer Sego, Joanne Grafton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Sego et al
as 2:2016cv03955
Defendant:
Daniel Sego and Charles L Ryan
Plaintiff:
Robert Dennis Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arteaga-Salas v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv02421
Plaintiff:
Pedro Arteaga-Salas
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Corizon, Daniel Sego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
