Cases 11 - 20 of 209
SINGH v. NATIONWIDE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2023cv05100
Plaintiff:
KULRAJ SINGH doing business as VALLEY MARK, LLC
Defendant:
NATIONWIDE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01741
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Hyrcko v. Singh
as 2:2023cv03872
Plaintiff:
William P Hyrcko
Defendant:
Harmanpreet Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208
Singh v. Vaughn
as 2:2023cv03415
Plaintiff:
Gagandeep Singh
Defendant:
Seth V Vaughn and Cameron T Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Singh v. Vaughn et al
as 5:2023cv03415
Plaintiff:
Gagandeep Singh
Defendant:
Cameron T Vaughn and Seth V Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
SINGH v. TOMMY GUN, INC.
as 2:2023cv02838
Plaintiff:
KARANVEER SINGH
Defendant:
TOMMY GUN, INC. doing business as TARGETMASTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
TIMKO et al v. NSPA LOUNGE LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01307
Defendant:
YADWINDER SINGH, BALJINDER KAUR, HIMANSHU BHATIA and others
Plaintiff:
TERRI TIMKO, ANTHONY ROBINSON and STEPHANIE DARNELL
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
TINDER BOX INTERNATIONAL LTD. v. WALDORF CIGAR BAR AND LOUNGE LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02381
Plaintiff:
TINDER BOX INTERNATIONAL LTD.
Defendant:
WALDORF CIGAR BAR AND LOUNGE LLC, MANJOTH RAJ SINGH and SUMIT GUPTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00969
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
