Cases 11 - 20 of 279
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Chappel v. Hunter et al
as 1:2023cv00728
Plaintiff:
Dawn M Chappel
Defendant:
Magistrate David M Hunter, Tyler Cantrell, Mackenzie Carrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
CRUSA Cincinnati, LLC v. O'Hara et al
as 1:2023cv00361
Plaintiff:
CRUSA Cincinnati, LLC
Defendant:
Randy M. O'Hara, SERVPRO OF CAMPBELL COUNTY, SERVPRO OF ANDERSON, FRANKLIN & SCOTT COUNTIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Spencer v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01689
Plaintiff:
Scott Spencer
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Colston v. Eddy
as 2:2023cv01599
Plaintiff:
Spencer Colston
Defendant:
Andrew Eddy, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2023cv01578
Plaintiff:
Gloria Spencer
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol A Subsidiary C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
