Cases 11 - 20 of 161
Sullivan, Jr. v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03914
Plaintiff:
Theoplis Sullivan, Jr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sullivan v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03699
Plaintiff:
Charles Sullivan
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sullivan v. O'Malley et al.
as 1:2023cv01913
Plaintiff:
Donald Sullivan
Defendant:
Michael C. O'Malley, Judge Deborah M. Turner, Judge Wanda C. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Filing Error
as 1:2023cv01888
Plaintiff:
Mark Sullivan
Defendant:
Ohio State University
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Sullivan v. The Ohio State University
as 2:2023cv03174
Plaintiff:
Mark Sullivan
Defendant:
The Ohio State University
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Sullivan et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02566
Plaintiff:
Patrick I. Sullivan and Gwendolyn Sullivan
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sullivan v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01575
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Sullivan
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sullivan v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01423
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Sullivan
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sullivan-Porter v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01233
Plaintiff:
Michele Sullivan-Porter
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
