Cases 11 - 20 of 21
ANDERSON v. Sumter County School District et al
as 1:2019cv00041
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT TORRANCE CHOATES and Sumter County School District
Plaintiff:
DR. LEZLEY B. ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Allen v. Pannell et al
as 1:2019cv00535
Plaintiff:
Denver Fenton Allen, Mobb S... Monsta, Fenton Drumma Webb and others
Defendant:
Federal Marshal's Agency, Judge Walter Johnson, Thornton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. CURTIS et al
as 1:2018cv00229
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT JENNIFER CLARK and CHIEF CURTIS
Plaintiff:
MICAH WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYWARD v. TOBY et al
as 5:2018cv00357
Defendant:
ANNETTE TOBY, SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL CANNON, REGIONAL DIRECTOR ROBERT TOOLE and others
Plaintiff:
BENNY HAYWARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAJOR v. TARRELL et al
as 5:2018cv00356
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDANT MICHAEL CANNON, OFFICER SHAKEURA DANIELS, RICKY MYRICK and others
Plaintiff:
TROY S MAJOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FEDD v. JOHN DOE, et al.
as 5:2018cv00258
Defendant:
DICK, JOHN DOE, Superintendent SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
LEVI ARTHUR FEDD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv00067
Plaintiff:
John Cary Carter
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Gregory C. Dozier, Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawud v. Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2012cv02928
Plaintiff:
Wali Malik Dawud
Defendant:
Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles, James E. Donald, Albert R. Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Dekalb County Jail Superintendent et al
as 1:2012cv00969
Plaintiff:
Dennis Brown
Defendant:
Dekalb County Jail Superintendent, Berry and Adele Grubbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
