Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Larson v. Minnesota Sex Offender Program, the et al
as 0:2013cv01074
Plaintiff:
Hollis J. Larson
Defendant:
Minnesota Sex Offender Program, the, Lucinda Jesson, Cal Ludeman and others
Yazzie et al v. Moser et al
as 0:2012cv00399
Plaintiff:
Lionel Tohannie Yazzie, William Edward Will, Jr., Wesley Elmer Wills and others
Defendant:
Kevin Moser, Elizabeth Barbo, Scott Benoit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karsjens et al v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2011cv03659
Plaintiff:
Kevin Scott Karsjens , David LeRoy Gamble , Kevin John DeVillion and others
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, Lucinda Jesson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wills v. Jesson et al
as 0:2011cv03429
Plaintiff:
Wesley Elmer Wills
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson, Dennis Benson, Kevin Moser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beaulieu v. Jesson et al
as 0:2011cv02755
Plaintiff:
Wallace James Beaulieu
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson, Dennis Benson, Kevin Moser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beaulieu v. Jesson et al
as 0:2011cv02593
Plaintiff:
Wallace James Beaulieu
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson, Dennis Benson, Kevin Moser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larson v. Jesson
as 0:2011cv02247
Plaintiff:
Hollis J. Larson
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson, Cal Ludeman, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Canadian Pacific Railway Company et al
as 0:2008cv00078
Plaintiff:
Gregory A. Johnson, Gregory A. Johnson, Gregory A. Johnson and others
Defendant:
Canadian Pacific Railway Company, Canadian Pacific Railway Company, Canadian Pacific Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Johnson v. Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc. et al
as 0:2008cv00004
Plaintiff:
Deborah Susan Johnson
Defendant:
Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc. and Elizabeth Foster
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
