Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rover Tract No(s). WV-DO-SHB-011.510-ROW and WV-DO-SHB-013.000-ROW et al
as 1:2018cv00084
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Defendant:
Rover Tract No(s). WV-DO-SHB-011.510-ROW and WV-DO-SHB-013.000-ROW, Tobey Lynn Nutt, KAJ, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Doleman v. John Doe Administrator et al
as 5:2017cv00171
Plaintiff:
Raheim Doleman
Defendant:
John Doe Administrator, Sgt. Bullock, Jim Oxford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acosta v. Tate et al
as 2:2017cv04183
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Donald Tate, Fas Chek Supermarkets and Fas Chek Employee Medical Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Toweson et al v. Boston Scientific Corp. et al
as 2:2017cv03740
Plaintiff:
Susan Toweson , Rose Sykes , Dawn Vowiell and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp. and Doe Manufacturers 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jarrell et al v. Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc.
as 2:2017cv01371
Plaintiff:
Jamie Jarrell , Michelle Brown , Brandy Riggs and others
Defendant:
Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tate v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv11886
Plaintiff:
Carol Ann Tate
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tate v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv07675
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Tate
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Warren v. Tate et al
as 5:2016cv00036
Plaintiff:
Paul W. Warren/Strang
Defendant:
Rebecca Tate, Patrick Wilson, Scott Shough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv00483
Plaintiff:
Evelyn L. Tate
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tate et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv15885
Plaintiff:
Sonja Tate and Curtis Tate
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
