Cases 11 - 20 of 52
CATO INSTITUTE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2021cv00035
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Plaintiff:
CATO INSTITUTE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
CATO INSTITUTE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2020cv03678
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Plaintiff:
CATO INSTITUTE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
CATO INSTITUTE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2020cv03338
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Plaintiff:
CATO INSTITUTE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Immigrant Legal Resource Center et al v. Wolf et al
as 4:2020cv05883
Plaintiff:
OneAmerica, Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc., Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights and others
Defendant:
U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of Hawaii, State of New York, State of Oregon and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Fiyyaz Pirani v. Slack Technologies, Inc., et al
as 20-16419
Defendant / Appellant:
ACCEL GROWTH FUND INVESTORS 2016 L.L.C., GRAHAM SMITH, SOCIAL+CAPITAL PARTNERSHIP GP II L.P. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FIYYAZ PIRANI
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NATIONAL VENTURE CAPITAL ASSOCIATION, SECURITIES INDUSTRY AND FINANCIAL MARKETS ASSOCIATION and others
Kelvin Jones, et al v. Governor of Florida, et al
as 20-12003
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE, STATE OF NEBRASKA, THE STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and FLORIDA SECRETARY OF STATE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LUIS A MENDEZ, CURTIS BRYANT, LEE HOFFMAN and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF ALABAMA
American Society of Journalist, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 20-55408
Defendant / Appellee:
XAVIER BECERRA, Attorney General of the State of California
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATIONAL PRESS PHOTOGRAPHERS ASSOCIATION and AMERICAN SOCIETY OF JOURNALISTS AND AUTHORS, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MEDIA PHOTOGRAPHERS, INC., INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION, REASON FOUNDATION and others
Anas Elhady v. Charles Kable, IV
as 20-1311
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SAMIR ANWAR, WAEL HAKMEH, MURAT FRLJUCKIE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting Commissioner of United States Customs and Border Protection in his official capacity, CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, Director of the Terrorist Screening Center, in his official capacity, NICHOLAS J. RASMUSSEN, Director of the National Counterterrorism Center in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE, CATO INSTITUTE, FRED T. KOREMATSU CENTER FOR LAW & EQUALITY and others
Not Yet Classified:
ALAN MICHAEL MYGATT-TAUBER
State of California, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 20-15044
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Defense, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, RYAN D. MCCARTHY, senior official performing the duties of the Secretary of the Army and others
Plaintiff:
STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF VERMONT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF NEW MEXICO, STATE OF COLORADO and others
Amicus Curiae:
FORMER U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, EL PASO COUNTY, FORMER MEMBERS OF CONGRESS and others
In re: USA v. James Larkin, et al
as 19-56510
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN BRUNST, Real Party in Interest Defendant, MICHAEL LACEY, Real Party in Interest Defendant, JAMES LARKIN, Real Party in Interest Defendant and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: ANY AND ALL FUNDS HELD IN REPUBLIC BANK OF ARIZONA ACCOUNTS XXXX1889, XXXX2592, XXXX1938, XXXX2912, AND XXXX2500
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
REASON FOUNDATION, CATO INSTITUTE and DKT LIBERTY PROJECT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
