Cases 11 - 20 of 29
White v. Larusch, et al
as 1:2018cv01245
Defendant:
Ofc. Jon Gullo, Ofc. John Doe, Ofc. Brandon Hawkins and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tripp v. Brann et al
as 1:2018cv05592
Respondent:
Cynthia Brann and Warden Anna M. Kross Center
Petitioner:
Arthur Tripp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv01143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowling v. Jamison et al
as 9:2018cv00597
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Jamison, Vanarnald and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene A. Bowling, Jr. and Eugene Bowling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Tripp et al
as 1:2018cv00329
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Virginia A. Tripp, James B. Tripp, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv06006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv01356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Kong et al v. Standard Medical Acceptance Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv07539
Plaintiff:
Roanna Kong , Genevieve Ngambia and John and Jane Does 1 Through 10
Defendant:
Standard Medical Acceptance Corporation, Sylvain Raynes, William Janzen and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Powell v. Tripp et al
as 1:2014cv02605
Plaintiff:
Marsha Powell
Defendant:
Jacob C. Tripp and Michael V. Tripp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Tripp v. Giant Interactive Group Inc et al
as 1:2014cv02177
Plaintiff:
Peter Tripp
Defendant:
Giant Interactive Group Inc, Yuzhu Shi, Wei Liu and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
