Cases 11 - 20 of 144
Tucker v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
Alexander Tucker
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Tucker v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02976
Plaintiff:
Alaric Tucker
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tucker v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02907
Plaintiff:
Edwin Tucker
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tucker et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02571
Plaintiff:
Raymond Tucker, Jr. and Peggy Tucker
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Packer v. Tucker Landscaping, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00286
Defendant:
Tucker Landscaping and Tucker Landscaping, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ronald Packer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Morris Sr. v. Turner
as 3:2022cv00279
Plaintiff:
Leon A. Morris Sr.
Defendant:
J. David Turner, Michael L. Tucker, Jeffery M. Welbaum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fontain v. Nestor et al
as 1:2022cv00431
Defendant:
Judge Terry Nestor, Harjinder Sandhu, Terrance Alysius Nestor and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Fontain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
