Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Mendez et al v. Mi Cocina Ltd. et al
as 3:2017cv02554
Plaintiff:
Juan Ramon Mendez , Erika Aguilera , Isidoro Martinez and others
Defendant:
Mi Cocina Ltd, M Crowd GP LLC and M Crowd Restaurant Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tamayo et al v. Credit One Financial
as 7:2017cv00222
Plaintiff:
Refugio Tamayo , Richard Jenkins , Cassandra Dixon and others
Defendant:
Credit One Financial
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Tamayo v. USA
as 3:2016cv01863
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Alejandro Tamayo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Tamayo v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv00670
Plaintiff:
Jorge Tamayo
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Parole, Texas Correctional Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tamayo v. Metropolitan Group Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 4:2015cv01048
Defendant:
Metropolitan Group Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Archito Tamayo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Tamayo v. Timekeepers, Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv00955
Defendant:
Shawn R. Fluitt, Tier One Security, Inc. and Timekeepers, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Juan Padron and Christian Tamayo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
USA v. Tamayo
as 2:2014cv00016
Defendant:
Rolando Tamayo
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Tamayo v. Perry et al
as 1:2014cv00031
Defendant:
Romulo Chavez, Juanita Gonzalez, David Gutierrez and others
Plaintiff:
Edgar Arias Tamayo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tamayo v. United States of America
as 3:2013cv05035
Petitioner:
Alejandro Tamayo
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Tamayo v. United States of America
as 3:2013cv03473
Petitioner:
Alejandro Tamayo
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
