Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Armstrong v. Bury
as 2:2015cv00037
Plaintiff:
Robert T. Armstrong
Defendant:
Ted P. Bury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tidyman's Management Services, Inc. et al v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA et al
as 9:2015cv00065
Plaintiff:
Tidyman's Management Services, Inc. , Lenora Davis Bateman , Vicki Earhart and others
Defendant:
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boniecki v. Fox et al
as 6:2015cv00019
Plaintiff:
Ted Boniecki
Defendant:
Tim Fox and State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poulson v. Attorney General of the State of Montana et al
as 9:2014cv00185
Plaintiff:
Kermit Poulson
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of Montana, Ken Park, Kalispell Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glick v. Molloy et al
as 9:2011cv00168
Plaintiff:
Ronald D. Glick
Defendant:
Donald W. Molloy, Jeremiah Lynch, Keith Strong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sullivan v. Ortley et al
as 9:2011cv00131
Plaintiff:
Billy Budd Sullivan
Defendant:
David Ortley, Ted Lympus, Supreme Court Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dubray v. Chester et al
as 4:2010cv00052
Plaintiff:
Donald F. Dubray
Defendant:
Ted Chester and Craig Gilum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunsmore v. State of Montana et al
as 6:2010cv00037
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Dunsmore
Defendant:
State of Montana, Ted O'Lympus, Katherine Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunsmore v. State of Montana et al
as 6:2010cv00004
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Dunsmore
Defendant:
State of Montana, Corrections Corporation of America, Does 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Voerding v. Mahoney
as 6:2009cv00073
Petitioner:
Ted Matthew Voerding
Respondent:
Mike Mahoney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
