Cases 11 - 20 of 66
Air Evac EMS, Inc. v. Cheatham et al
as 2:2016cv05224
Plaintiff:
Air Evac EMS, Inc.
Defendant:
Ted Cheatham , Mary Jane Pickens , Joshua Sword and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03104
Plaintiff:
Marlene James and Ted James
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nelson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00187
Plaintiff:
Pamela Nelson and Ted A. Nelson, Jr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fackrell et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv15287
Plaintiff:
Connie Lou Fackrell and Ted Warren Fackrell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Williams
as 2:2015cv00083
Petitioner:
Ted James Johnson, Jr.
Respondent:
Charles Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Asay et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv13784
Plaintiff:
Merry Ann Asay and Ted Asay
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arneault et al v. Brnilovich et al
as 5:2015cv00129
Plaintiff:
Ted Arneault , Patrick Arneault , ORCA Outdoors, LLC and others
Defendant:
Melissa Brnilovich, Barclays Bank Delaware , PNC Bank, National Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wylie et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv11897
Plaintiff:
Dawn Wylie and Ted Wylie
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brandt et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv08704
Plaintiff:
Margaret Brandt and Ted Paolini
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edmondson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv07583
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Edmondson and Ted Edmondson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
